Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1259

reference
674-tree-1
name
1259
tree-preservation-order

undefined

674-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023599 50.883174)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023556 50.883169,-1.023558 50.883178,-1.023564 50.883185,-1.023573 50.883191,-1.023585 50.883195,-1.023598 50.883197,-1.023624 50.883192,-1.023633 50.883186,-1.023639 50.883178,-1.023642 50.883170,-1.023640 50.883162,-1.023634 50.883154,-1.023624 50.883148,-1.023613 50.883144,-1.023600 50.883143,-1.023586 50.883144,-1.023574 50.883148,-1.023565 50.883153,-1.023559 50.883161,-1.023556 50.883169)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL